The Sussex Colepepers
Origin of Name and Coat of Arms
Name
With regard to the derivation of the name Colepeper no satisfactory explanation has
ever been given, but as the first of the family of whom we have any mention, the
"Recognitor Magnae Assisae tempore Regis Johannis," is called Thomas de
Colepeper, we may fairly conclude that the name either bore a local signification, or it
refers to the occupation, or calling in life, of those who first adopted it. If the name
is a local one two places have been suggested from which it may be derived, viz.,
Gollesberghe, in Sandwich, co. Kent and Goldspur, or Culspore, a hundred in the Rape of
Hastings. If, on the other hand, the name is connected in some way with the occupation of
those who first assumed it, then it is argued that in the same manner as Coleprophet means
a false prophet, and Coletragitour a false traitor, so Colepeper may mean a false
pepperer, or sham grocer, i.e., one who traded outside the Fraternity of Pepperers, the
Guild whence sprang the Grocers' Company, which was incorporated in 1345. Another
suggestion points to the possibility of Colepeper meaning Blackpepper, while another hints
at the likelihood of there having been formerly some industry in which the culling or
picking of pepper may have formed one of the chief branches.
Coat of Arms
The armorial bearings of the family, Arg: a bend engrailed, gu.,
may possibly furnish a clue to its origin. Papworth, in his Ordinary of British
Armorials, mentions some sixty families as bearing the bend engrailed, but apparently
only two of them, viz., Chitcroft and Walrand, displayed identically the same coat as the
Colepepers. As Robert Walrand, in the Roll of Arms, temp. Henry III., appears as
the owner of this coat,1 the Colepepers probably got it somehow through him, and they were
using it as early as 3 Edward III. (1329), when John, the son of Sir Thomas Colepeper, is
recorded as bearing it, and his brother Richard differenced it with a label of three
points.2 The Chitcrofts also were probably either Colepepers or closely connected with
them, as not only are their arms identical, but we find the two families associated
together at a very early period. In 1299 Benedicta, daughter of Thomas de Chitcroft,
granted land in Beghal, with a mill in Pepinbury, to Thomas, son of Thomas Colepeper, and
Margery his wife,3 while in 11 Henry IV (1409) the names of John Chitcroft and Thomas
Colepeper chivaler, appear coupled as defendants in an action brouglht by John Mortymer,
relating to the manor of Asshen, co. Northants.4 An investigation of the early Walrand and
Chitcroft pedigrees would doubtless reveal some connection with Colepeper, but would
probably give no clue to the origin of the name, which may, therefore, be left to the
choice of the reader or to his further researches.
To next chapter
Footnotes
1 S.A.C. Vol. XXIV, 30
2 Coll. Top. et Gen., VII, 337
3 Harl., Ch. 77, f. 20
4 Genealogist, Vols XIV, 252; XVI, 38
Last Revised: 02 Jan 2015